"Taken as true, these facts give rise to a plausible inference that defendants at a minimum had reason to investigate and uncover end-user infringement," Stein wrote. To Stein, the fact that OpenAI maintains an "ongoing relationship" with users by providing outputs that respond to users' prompts also supports contributory infringement claims, despite OpenAI's argument that ChatGPT's "substantial noninfringing uses" are exonerative. OpenAI defeated some claims For OpenAI, Stein's ruling likely di...